Sunday 12 June 2011

From Nepal http://thenextfront.com/politics/bombard-the-headquarters-mao-zedong.html

Bombard The Headquarters: Mao Zedong

(Now the time has come to make Big Posters. As Comrade Mao has mentioned: ‘Anyone wanting to overthrow a political rĂ©gime must create public opinion and do some preparatory ideological work. This applies to counter-revolutionary as well as to revolutionary classes.’ Yes, this applies not only outside the party, but also within the party.  These days, we Nepalese revolutionaries  are  fighting against the revisionists  of the 21st century, who have captured the party headquarter. Then we must have our  own new Big Posters. This time we have Bombard The Headquarters – My Big-Character, by Comrade Mao.)
Bombard The Headquarters – My Big-Character Poster was a short document written by Mao Zedong on August 5, 1966 during the 11th Plenary Session of the 8th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and published on the Communist Party‘s official newspaper People’s Daily the same day.
It is commonly believed that this “poster” directly targeted Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping, who were then in charge of Chinese government’s daily affairs and who tried to cool down the mass hysteria which had been coming into shape in several universities in Beijing since the May 16 Notice, through which Mao officially launched the Cultural Revolution, was issued.
The text of the poster was :
China’s first Marxist-Leninist big-character poster and Commentator’s article on it in People’s Daily are indeed superbly written! Comrades, please read them again. But in the last fifty days or so some leading comrades from the central down to the local levels have acted in a diametrically opposite way. Adopting the reactionary stand of the bourgeoisie, they have enforced a bourgeois dictatorship and struck down the surging movement of the great cultural revolution of the proletariat. They have stood facts on their head and juggled black and white, encircled and suppressed revolutionaries, stifled opinions differing from their own, imposed a white terror, and felt very pleased with themselves. They have puffed up the arrogance of the bourgeoisie and deflated the morale of the proletariat. How poisonous! Viewed in connection with the Right deviation in 1962 and the wrong tendency of 1964 which was ‘Left’ in form but Right in essence, shouldn’t this make one wide awake?
Source: Peking Review, No. 33, August 11, 1967